Categories
- Azerbaijan Press
- Events
- International Press
- Internet Sites
- Khojaly
- Turkish Press
- Uncategorized
- United Nations
Latest News
- Azerbaijan and Armenia to meet soon
- Azerbaijani MP Calls For Sanctions Against Armenia
- Azerbaijan: Baku Fumes Over Scuttled Ambassadorial Appointment
- ‘Nagorno-Karabakh occupation impedes solution to Turkey-Armenia controversy’
- Karabakh conflict can be settled today – Medvedev
- Medvedev: Nagorno Karabakh Conflict Can Be Settled Quickly
- ‘Position of Azerbaijan in Karabakh conflict meets position of world community’
- “Turkey Has Clear Position On Nagorno Karabakh Conflict”
- Greater EU role in Karabakh conflict resolution ‘desirable’
- OSCE secretary-general: Turkey could play a role in Karabakh conflict
Monthly archives
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- August 2007
Search
Alexander Iskandaryan: “Results of a referendum on the status of Nagorno Karabakh are absolutely predictable”
Day.Az
Day.Az interview with famous Armenian political scientist Alexander Iskandaryan.
- How do you assess results of the meeting in Moscow, which ended in signing of a declaration on the peaceful resolution of the Karabakh conflict between the Presidents of Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia?
- The Moscow meeting of the three president proved what was clear before it: at the current stage the settlement of the Karabakh conflict is impossible. This declaration is a declaration in all senses. It declares intentions, which is certainly not bad but can hardly change the format of this protracted and complex problem, like Nagorno Karabakh.
- Is it possible to say that Azerbaijan has officially fixed its agreement for a referendum in Nagorno Karabakh on its status in 10-15 years in exchange for return of several occupied regions around Nagorno Karabakh?
- It is possible to say whatever one wants. Moreover, it will depend on the level of objectiveness of those who speak. In real, the declaration can not be “an official agreement”, such kind of documents are not made in a hurry.
- What do you think will be the results of a referendum on the status of Nagorno Karabakh?
- The results of the referendum on the status of Nagorno Karabakh are absolutely predictable. The ethnic nature of the policy in our region is great, the population will vote depending on ethnic belonging. Thus, the results of any referendum can be predicted by the number of people of any nationality. Therefore, the referendum can not be a way of the problem settlement, as there is no other variant.
First of all, we should adopt a political settlement and then define a place and issues of a referendum to attain the result, to which the parties of the agreement came. But the political settlement is impossible, therefore, we can argue for years among whom to hold this referendum.
- Is it possible that within these 10-15 years from the moment of liberation of a number of currently occupied regions of Azerbaijan, our countries will develop such friendly and good-neighbor relations that the status of Nagorno Karabakh will not be important?
- There is no such a possibility. This will not occur in a short period of time. Generations are needed for that.
- What will be the balance of powers in the whole South Caucasus region, its economic and political future in case of the settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict?
- The Karabakh conflict will not be settled in the near future. But even if we imagine it, the South Caucasus will not turn into Switzerland in an hour.
And the proof is Azerbaijan and Georgia. Political relations are not bad, borders are open, there are communications, railroads are working, pipelines are also working. And what? Azerbaijan is interesting for Georgia as a source of energy, while Georgia for Azerbaijan as a territory. The economies are integrated weekly, similar economies are usually badly integrated.
This is a common event, for example, in Eastern Europe. Bulgaria wants to integrate with Bosnia or Albania, while the second and the third want integration with Germany. Nothing extraordinary will happen even if Azerbaijan and Georgia involve Armenia with Karabakh, though, of course, positive results will be recorded.
The same is in the internal political spheres. Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan need to integrate with Europe, try to assimilate its values, institutions, regulation mechanisms and not use each others as an example, that they are trying to do with a temporary success.
As for the balance of powers, changes will accelerate here, but they will not change the reality. Russia, Iran, Turkey and the United States will remain players in the region. No one will quit it. Their weights will undoubtedly, change, but they are strictly changing now.
Source : www.today.az/news/politics/48959.html
Posted by admin
November 2008
Post A Comment